Doing Business on

Hi there! This post is currently being rewritten and will be republished shortly.

More companies are making their way to to build their web presence either as a blog or as a full website (as long as e-commerce is not the primary function of the site). And what’s not to like? On signing up and agreeing to the Terms of Service, a company gets a free or low-cost website with all updates and security handled by Automattic, excellent SEO built right into the platform, an excellent up-time record and, if a company chooses to buy the Domain Name Upgrade, there’s also easy branding or integration with the company’s existing website.  If you are comfortable with not having total control over your website, mostly in the areas of plug-ins and use of special code, is an excellent choice for business.

So what’s not to like? Those same updates to the entire SaaS platform can cause disruption to posting. This is not a frequent occurrence, but it does happen. Also, does show advertising on free-hosted websites, but these can be easily removed with the annual No Ads upgrade. Alternatively site owners with their own domains may consider applying for the revenue-sharing WordAds program. recently introduced a Business upgrade which for an annual fee of US$300 includes all the benefits of the Pro upgrade as well as access to all the Premium themes, unlimited storage, unlimited upload of audio and video and much more. Check it out in your Dashboard under “Store”.

Without a doubt, the single biggest disruption to a company website happens when the company leaves the sign up and creation of their website to an employee who subsequently departs and takes the company’s log-in information with them. This may not be a problem as long as the employee used a company email address to create the account and the email address is still active, as it can then be used to retrieve the log-in information. But what happens if that is not the case or sign up was left to an external, 3rd party such as a web designer? Staff have clearly stated that a site is owned by the individual who originally signed up and created the site and will not transfer the site to anyone else.

If you are using your site as your business portal, it would be wise to establish clear ownership of the site from the start in order to safeguard your company’s web presence. Site owners cannot be removed from a site by another Administrator unless they first transfer ownership of their site to another account. Site owners can invite a second Administrator, which has its own dangers, or an Editor to maintain their already created website.

With the creation of the new Business and Enterprise tiers indicating a push to bring more business sites to, I feel should consider removing any invited Administrator’s ability to delete the site, but maintain all the other Admin functions. Otherwise, there may be a growing number of unhappy business owners who suddenly find their website, its content and perhaps even a custom domain name out of their reach.

Addendum: One of my readers emailed me and pointed out quite rightly that the problem of losing site ownership through an employee leaving or a designer retaining Admin rights is not unique to However, the above post does deal specifically to the current situation on

Published by JenT

Retired dotcom forum moderator (2016-2021) helping site owners since 2006, one answer at a time. Find me at

5 thoughts on “Doing Business on

  1. yes there should be a better way to do ownership – we see on a regular basis people in the forum “the person that set up the blog is no longer with us – what do we do now?”

    The upgrades can use some improvements in the renewal process for the same reason – maybe adding a second Admin that has renewal rights – if set up at the start maybe people would fill in the box with a second person

    1. It’s really a company’s responsibility to be cautious with their assets, but they may be unaware of the full ramifications of their actions.That’s why I propose a second level of Admin. Effectively, of course this would not prevent a disgruntled employee from deleting the site’s content, but at least the site address would remain intact, which is the main problem.

      Nice idea about the additional Admin for renewals as well.

      1. Correct – Many companies don’t understand the ownership issue – they think of the cost like a printer cartridge bought by an employee and then put in the printer and then getting reimbursed – I doubt that many people / companies – think that far ahead – also some people are afraid of Admin privileges – I set up a blog for some friends – tried to transfer it to them but they did not want the Admin rights – so I still own it and they are Editor on their own site

Comments are closed.